Thiruvennainallur P.S. vs Rajendiran — 543/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP340008662024
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
652/2024
Filing Date
28-05-2024
Registration No
543/2024
Registration Date
28-05-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
391
Police Station
Thiruvennainallur P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thiruvennainallur P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajendiran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Service Pending-Summon
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 543/2024 involved witness depositions in a fatal road traffic accident case. On June 12, 2023, Selvaraj suffered injuries in a two-wheeler collision near Arasur and subsequently died on June 25, 2023 despite medical treatment. On June 27, 2025, the court recorded witness statements from three individuals (an ambulance medic, a rice mill worker, and a mobile shop owner) who testified about the accident circumstances and police site inspection conducted on June 14, 2023. No cross-examination was conducted by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 543/2024 involved witness depositions in a fatal road traffic accident case. On June 12, 2023, Selvaraj suffered injuries in a two-wheeler collision near Arasur and subsequently died on June 25, 2023 despite medical treatment. On June 27, 2025, the court recorded witness statements from three individuals (an ambulance medic, a rice mill worker, and a mobile shop owner) who testified about the accident circumstances and police site inspection conducted on June 14, 2023. No cross-examination was conducted by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts