senthil @senthilkumar vs Godandapani (late)and 9 others Advocate - S.Pakkirisamy — 123/2024

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25 (b). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 09-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVP340008142024

Filing Number

185/2024

Filing Date

05-Aug-2015

Registration No

123/2024

Registration Date

05-Aug-2015

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 25 (b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.senthil @senthilkumar

    Adv. Anbazhagan.M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Godandapani (late)and 9 others Advocate - S.Pakkirisamy

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 21-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 13-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 16-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 02-Dec-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 27-Nov-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 06-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 23-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 09-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 25-Sep-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 18-Sep-2025

    Deposition

    Case 123/2024 Summary This is a civil property dispute case heard in the District Civil and Criminal Court at Tiruvannamalai on 18 September 2025. The case involves a property inheritance dispute where the petitioner (Senthilkumar) claims rights over agricultural land. The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding property divisions, deeds of gift, and inheritance claims between the parties. The judgment records witness statements confirming details about property boundaries, ancestral ownership, and deed transfers, but the final order on the merits of the case is not clearly stated in this document excerpt—only procedural examination proceedings are documented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 18-Sep-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 04-Sep-2025

    Deposition

  25. 04-Sep-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 21-Aug-2025

    Deposition

  27. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  30. 24-Jul-2025

    Deposition

  31. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  32. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  33. 03-Jul-2025

    Deposition

  34. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  35. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  36. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  37. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  38. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  39. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  40. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  41. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  42. 03-Feb-2025

    Deposition

  43. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  44. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  45. 07-Jan-2025

    Deposition

  46. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  47. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  48. 19-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  49. 16-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  50. 18-Nov-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  51. 03-Sep-2024

    Restored

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  52. 03-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  53. 03-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  54. 29-Aug-2024

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  55. 19-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  56. 19-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 05-Aug-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 123/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 123/2024 Summary This is a civil property dispute case heard in the District Civil and Criminal Court at Tiruvannamalai on 18 September 2025. The case involves a property inheritance dispute where the petitioner (Senthilkumar) claims rights over agricultural land. The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding property divisions, deeds of gift, and inheritance claims between the parties. The judgment records witness statements confirming details about property boundaries, ancestral ownership, and deed transfers, but the final order on the merits of the case is not clearly stated in this document excerpt—only procedural examination proceedings are documented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case