FRO Ulundurpet. vs Seetharaman — 414/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 21(d),(g). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP340005412024
Filing Number
426/2024
Filing Date
25-Jan-2016
Registration No
414/2024
Registration Date
25-Jan-2016
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
08
Police Station
FRO Ulundurpet PS.
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FRO Ulundurpet.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Seetharaman
-
2.Kandhan
Case History
-
14-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-May-2026
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
This document is a witness deposition (Judicial Form No. 53) in Criminal Case 414/2024, recorded on February 20, 2025, before the District Civil and Criminal Court at T.V. Nallur. The witness, a forest officer named Shankar, testified regarding an alleged theft of forest wood from a reserved forest area near Tirutani on January 23-24, 2016. The witness provided direct examination testimony describing how he discovered unauthorized wood extraction and reported it, leading to the investigation and arrest of respondent Seetharaman. The document includes extensive cross-examination by the second respondent (Kandhan), challenging various aspects of the investigation, evidence collection, and confessional statement procedures. No specific case outcome (bail, verdict, or order) is recorded in this deposition document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2025
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2025
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2025
Copies
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jan-2025
Copies
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2024
Copies
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2024
Copies
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2024
Copies
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Aug-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jan-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 414/2024
This document is a witness deposition (Judicial Form No. 53) in Criminal Case 414/2024, recorded on February 20, 2025, before the District Civil and Criminal Court at T.V. Nallur. The witness, a forest officer named Shankar, testified regarding an alleged theft of forest wood from a reserved forest area near Tirutani on January 23-24, 2016. The witness provided direct examination testimony describing how he discovered unauthorized wood extraction and reported it, leading to the investigation and arrest of respondent Seetharaman. The document includes extensive cross-examination by the second respondent (Kandhan), challenging various aspects of the investigation, evidence collection, and confessional statement procedures. No specific case outcome (bail, verdict, or order) is recorded in this deposition document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts