Raguraman vs Arakandanallur P.S — 154/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP340003832026

Filing Number

373/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

154/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raguraman

    Adv. Tr.Vijayapiruthivirajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arakandanallur P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court at Thiruvennainallur granted bail to accused Raguraman in a case involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 326, 506(ii) and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, considering his repeated absences during multiple court hearings despite summons and an NBW. The bail was granted on conditions including execution of two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, daily court appearance at 10 a.m., cooperation in trial proceedings, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 154/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court at Thiruvennainallur granted bail to accused Raguraman in a case involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 326, 506(ii) and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, considering his repeated absences during multiple court hearings despite summons and an NBW. The bail was granted on conditions including execution of two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, daily court appearance at 10 a.m., cooperation in trial proceedings, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case