Ramalingam vs Vaithiyalingam — 98/2024
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25 A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVP340003812024
Filing Number
101/2024
Filing Date
17-Jul-2017
Registration No
98/2024
Registration Date
17-Jul-2017
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramalingam
Adv. Suresh Babu.V
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vaithiyalingam
-
2.Devasundharam
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 98/2024 This is a property dispute between Ramalingam (petitioner/defendant) and Vaithiyalingam with Devasundharam (respondents/plaintiffs) heard before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Thiruvananthapuram on June 18, 2026. The case involves competing claims to ancestral and purchased property, with Ramalingam contesting the validity of agreements and documents (marked as Exh.1 and Exh.2) allegedly establishing Vaithiyalingam's entitlement to the disputed property. The court recorded Ramalingam's detailed cross-examination testimony regarding property sales, inheritance, partitions, and the authenticity of key documents. The case remains under adjudication with no final order yet issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2025
Restored
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
15-Oct-2024
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2024
Restored
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2024
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2024
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2024
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Aug-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2024
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Apr-2024
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jul-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2024
Summary of Case 98/2024 This is a property dispute between Ramalingam (petitioner/defendant) and Vaithiyalingam with Devasundharam (respondents/plaintiffs) heard before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Thiruvananthapuram on June 18, 2026. The case involves competing claims to ancestral and purchased property, with Ramalingam contesting the validity of agreements and documents (marked as Exh.1 and Exh.2) allegedly establishing Vaithiyalingam's entitlement to the disputed property. The court recorded Ramalingam's detailed cross-examination testimony regarding property sales, inheritance, partitions, and the authenticity of key documents. The case remains under adjudication with no final order yet issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts