Arakandanallur P.S. vs Elumalai — 253/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 354C, 506(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP340003352024

Evidence

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

263/2024

Filing Date

07-09-2021

Registration No

253/2024

Registration Date

07-09-2021

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 354C, 506(1)

Petitioner(s)

Arakandanallur P.S.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Elumalai

Paramasivam

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

06-03-2026

Evidence

04-03-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Evidence

21-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

27-06-2025
Deposition
21-01-2026
Deposition

This document records the deposition of a witness (Judicial Form No. 53) in Criminal Case No. 253/2024 before the District Court at T.V. Nallur on January 21, 2026. The witness, a 48-year-old laborer named Arumugan, testified that he signed a site plan approximately 4 years ago near a temple in Mambuundi when police were documenting a case-related sketch, and confirmed the signature in the visual record was his. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged signing the document at the spot when the investigator requested it, clarifying inconsistencies in his testimony about whether he was called to the police station. The court examined the witness's credibility regarding the circumstances and timing of the signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the deposition of a witness (Judicial Form No. 53) in Criminal Case No. 253/2024 before the District Court at T.V. Nallur on January 21, 2026. The witness, a 48-year-old laborer named Arumugan, testified that he signed a site plan approximately 4 years ago near a temple in Mambuundi when police were documenting a case-related sketch, and confirmed the signature in the visual record was his. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged signing the document at the spot when the investigator requested it, clarifying inconsistencies in his testimony about whether he was called to the police station. The court examined the witness's credibility regarding the circumstances and timing of the signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case