Thiruvenninallur P.S. vs Shanmugam — 176/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,323,324. Status: Framing of Charges. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Framing of Charges Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP340002042024

Filing Number

186/2024

Filing Date

03-Dec-2016

Registration No

176/2024

Registration Date

03-Dec-2016

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

895

Police Station

Thiruvennainallur P.S

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,323,324
Mp/1/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Thiruvenninallur P.S.Sathiyaraj
Mp/2/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Thiruvenninallur P.S.Bakkyam
Mp/4/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Thiruvenninallur P.S.Sathiyaraj

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thiruvenninallur P.S.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shanmugam

  2. 2.Sathiyaraj

  3. 3.Veeran

  4. 4.Bakkyam

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 19-May-2026

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 15-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 21-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 176/2024 This is a witness deposition proceeding dated November 21, 2025, before the District Civil and Criminal Court at Thiruvenninallur. The case involves Thiruvenninallur P.S. against respondents Shanmugam, Sathiyaraj, and Veeran. The document records the examination and cross-examination of witness (A.Sa.5) under Section 54 of the 1969 CrPC. During cross-examination, the defense counsel extensively challenged the investigating officer's testimony regarding investigation procedures, witness interviews, scene of crime examination, and alleged inconsistencies between the FIR and the investigation report. The court admitted a CrPC Section 317 application filed by the defense regarding the fourth accused. No re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 21-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 19-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 07-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 14-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 10-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 26-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 12-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 22-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 30-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  30. 11-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  31. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  32. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  33. 23-May-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  34. 30-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  35. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  36. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  37. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  38. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  39. 27-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  40. 04-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  41. 13-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  42. 23-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  43. 04-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  44. 30-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  45. 26-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  46. 02-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  47. 10-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  48. 12-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 03-Dec-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 176/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 176/2024 This is a witness deposition proceeding dated November 21, 2025, before the District Civil and Criminal Court at Thiruvenninallur. The case involves Thiruvenninallur P.S. against respondents Shanmugam, Sathiyaraj, and Veeran. The document records the examination and cross-examination of witness (A.Sa.5) under Section 54 of the 1969 CrPC. During cross-examination, the defense counsel extensively challenged the investigating officer's testimony regarding investigation procedures, witness interviews, scene of crime examination, and alleged inconsistencies between the FIR and the investigation report. The court admitted a CrPC Section 317 application filed by the defense regarding the fourth accused. No re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case