Thiruvennainallur P.S. vs Dhanasakaran Advocate - R. Kumaran — 79/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 323, 324, 506(1). Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 08th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP340000872023
Filing Number
87/2023
Filing Date
19-Sep-2016
Registration No
79/2023
Registration Date
19-Sep-2016
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
279
Police Station
Thiruvennainallur P.S
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thiruvennainallur P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhanasakaran Advocate - R. Kumaran
-
2.Jayakumar
Adv. Kumaran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: 79/2023 Court Decision: The District Court of Tiruvannamalai convicted both respondents (Dhanasakaran and R. Kumaran) on charges of voluntarily causing hurt (IPC §323), criminal intimidation (§506(1)), and criminal intimidation by threat (§294(b)). The court found the complainant's testimony as an injured eyewitness credible and corroborated by witness accounts. Respondent 1 was sentenced to one month imprisonment or ₹5,000 fine for §294(b), ₹1,000 fine for §323; Respondent 2 received three months imprisonment or ₹5,000 fine for §324. Compensation of ₹10,000 was awarded to the injured party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2025
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2025
Deposition
-
14-Nov-2025
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2025
Deposition
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Oct-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Aug-2024
Cmp Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jun-2024
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2024
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Mar-2024
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Mar-2024
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2024
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2024
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 79/2023
Case Summary: 79/2023 Court Decision: The District Court of Tiruvannamalai convicted both respondents (Dhanasakaran and R. Kumaran) on charges of voluntarily causing hurt (IPC §323), criminal intimidation (§506(1)), and criminal intimidation by threat (§294(b)). The court found the complainant's testimony as an injured eyewitness credible and corroborated by witness accounts. Respondent 1 was sentenced to one month imprisonment or ₹5,000 fine for §294(b), ₹1,000 fine for §323; Respondent 2 received three months imprisonment or ₹5,000 fine for §324. Compensation of ₹10,000 was awarded to the injured party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts