Thiruvennainallur P.S. vs Maria Anthony @ Anthonisamy Advocate - Thamizharasan N — 53/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 506(ii), 448. Status: Await Records. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP340000602023
Filing Number
60/2023
Filing Date
28-Apr-2017
Registration No
53/2023
Registration Date
28-Apr-2017
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
531
Police Station
Thiruvennainallur P.S
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thiruvennainallur P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Maria Anthony @ Anthonisamy Advocate - Thamizharasan N
-
2.Arul @ Aroia Aruldoss
Adv. Thamizharasan N
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-May-2026
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Dec-2025
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2025
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2025
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2025
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Apr-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Mar-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2025
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 53/2023 This is a witness deposition document (not a final court order) dated January 10, 2025, in a criminal case before the Thiruvennainallur Magistrate Court. A 61-year-old witness from Mathampatti testified that he has no knowledge of the accused, the complainant, or the case details, and denies signing any witness statement allegedly prepared by police regarding a fight incident from November 4, 2013. During cross-examination by the prosecution, the witness maintained he was not involved in the police investigation and did not authenticate any police-prepared documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jan-2025
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2024
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2024
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Nov-2024
Await Records
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jul-2024
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2024
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Apr-2024
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2024
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Mar-2024
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2024
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2024
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2023
Summary of Case 53/2023 This is a witness deposition document (not a final court order) dated January 10, 2025, in a criminal case before the Thiruvennainallur Magistrate Court. A 61-year-old witness from Mathampatti testified that he has no knowledge of the accused, the complainant, or the case details, and denies signing any witness statement allegedly prepared by police regarding a fight incident from November 4, 2013. During cross-examination by the prosecution, the witness maintained he was not involved in the police investigation and did not authenticate any police-prepared documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts