Arakandanallur P.S vs Pavunkumar Advocate - Duraipandiyan. S — 11/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP340000112024
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
11/2024
Filing Date
10-01-2020
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
10-01-2020
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
361
Police Station
Arakandanallur P.S
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arakandanallur P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pavunkumar Advocate - Duraipandiyan. S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records witness depositions in Case C.C. No. 11/2024, heard on February 9, 2026, before the District Court at Tiruvannamalai. Two witnesses testified regarding a fatal hit-and-run accident in which a person named Velu was struck by a Bajaj Discovery motorcycle (TN32AC4870) while pushing his disabled two-wheeler, resulting in his death. The witness statements describe the high-speed collision, the vehicle's subsequent crash 35 feet away, and Velu's eventual death despite hospitalization. The respondent was absent, and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records witness depositions in Case C.C. No. 11/2024, heard on February 9, 2026, before the District Court at Tiruvannamalai. Two witnesses testified regarding a fatal hit-and-run accident in which a person named Velu was struck by a Bajaj Discovery motorcycle (TN32AC4870) while pushing his disabled two-wheeler, resulting in his death. The witness statements describe the high-speed collision, the vehicle's subsequent crash 35 feet away, and Velu's eventual death despite hospitalization. The respondent was absent, and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts