Thulasidasan vs Settu — 192/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC Order 21Rule 11(2),CPC Order 21Rule 37 and 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNVP190012912024
e-Filing Number
05-12-2024
Filing Number
1367/2024
Filing Date
18-Dec-2024
Registration No
192/2024
Registration Date
19-Dec-2024
Court
Sub Court, Gingee
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thulasidasan
Adv. V.Sakthirajan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Settu
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Ea Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Ea Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Ea Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Ea Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 192/2024 (Thulasidasan v. Settu) In this property dispute heard on 29.07.2025, petitioner Thulasidasan testified under oath regarding a deed (M.SA.1) in the respondent's name. Thulasidasan's written statement was accepted as oral evidence, and he requested the court to accept his affidavit and documents to decide the petition in his favor. The court recorded his testimony and admitted the evidence submitted by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Jun-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 192/2024
Case Summary: 192/2024 (Thulasidasan v. Settu) In this property dispute heard on 29.07.2025, petitioner Thulasidasan testified under oath regarding a deed (M.SA.1) in the respondent's name. Thulasidasan's written statement was accepted as oral evidence, and he requested the court to accept his affidavit and documents to decide the petition in his favor. The court recorded his testimony and admitted the evidence submitted by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts