Gandhimadhi vs Annamalai — 240/2022
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section sec37. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVP190008282022
Filing Number
927/2022
Filing Date
02-Sep-2022
Registration No
240/2022
Registration Date
21-Sep-2022
Court
Sub Court, Gingee
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gandhimadhi
Adv. Tr.K.Vijayan, M.A.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Annamalai
-
2.Kannayiram
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Deposition
Case 240/2022 concerns a property dispute where petitioner Gandhimadhi claims rights to four properties in Nanjayanandhapuram, asserting she has a share despite her husband (Respondent 1 Annamalai, her father-in-law) claiming they are his personal properties. On April 27, 2026, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of Respondent 1's witness (Ramaiah, age 55), who testified that the properties were partitioned among three brothers in 1978 and 1988, with Respondent 1 enjoying individual possession. The case involves marital discord and property ownership disputes between the petitioner and respondents, with the house purchased in 2005. The proceedings continued with witness examination; no final order on the merits was issued on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Deposition
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Deposition
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Deposition
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
Deposition
-
29-Jan-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Oct-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Sep-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Apr-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Feb-2024
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Nov-2023
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Oct-2023
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Oct-2023
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Sep-2023
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Sep-2023
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Sep-2023
Deposition
-
02-Sep-2023
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2023
Deposition
-
05-Aug-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Apr-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Feb-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 240/2022
Case 240/2022 concerns a property dispute where petitioner Gandhimadhi claims rights to four properties in Nanjayanandhapuram, asserting she has a share despite her husband (Respondent 1 Annamalai, her father-in-law) claiming they are his personal properties. On April 27, 2026, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of Respondent 1's witness (Ramaiah, age 55), who testified that the properties were partitioned among three brothers in 1978 and 1988, with Respondent 1 enjoying individual possession. The case involves marital discord and property ownership disputes between the petitioner and respondents, with the house purchased in 2005. The proceedings continued with witness examination; no final order on the merits was issued on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts