shriram Finance Limited Rep. by its power of attorney K.Arulraj S/O Kasiraja vs MUNIYAPPAN — 86/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 11(2) OF CPC,ORDER 21 RULE 37 AND 38 AND SECTION 151 OF CPC. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNVP190007372025

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

Next Hearing

15th July 2026

e-Filing Number

10-07-2025

Filing Number

831/2025

Filing Date

18-08-2025

Registration No

86/2025

Registration Date

19-08-2025

Court

Sub Court, Gingee

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 11(2) OF CPC,ORDER 21 RULE 37 AND 38 AND SECTION 151 OF CPC

Petitioner(s)

shriram Finance Limited Rep. by its power of attorney K.Arulraj S/O Kasiraja

Adv. SUDHAKARAN G

Respondent(s)

MUNIYAPPAN

RAJADURAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

08-06-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

06-06-2026

Orders

28-04-2026

Orders

16-03-2026

Enquiry

28-01-2026

Issue of Service

Interim Orders

28-04-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: 86/2025 Case: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chengalpattu), Case No. 86/2025 (arising from A.R.P. 157/2021), heard on 28.04.2026 Outcome: The petitioner's (Shriram Finance Limited's) first witness (K. Arulraj, supervisor) testified and submitted the written statement of claim. The witness affirmed his deposition under oath per the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. Cross-examination of the respondents' side was adjourned at the request of the respondents' counsel; proceedings to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 86/2025 Case: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chengalpattu), Case No. 86/2025 (arising from A.R.P. 157/2021), heard on 28.04.2026 Outcome: The petitioner's (Shriram Finance Limited's) first witness (K. Arulraj, supervisor) testified and submitted the written statement of claim. The witness affirmed his deposition under oath per the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. Cross-examination of the respondents' side was adjourned at the request of the respondents' counsel; proceedings to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Gingee All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case