Venkatesan vs Krishna Gounder Advocate - N.Kannadasan — 166/2021
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section or7r1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVP190006022021
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
704/2021
Filing Date
06-09-2021
Registration No
166/2021
Registration Date
20-09-2021
Court
Sub Court, Gingee
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkatesan
Adv. K.Gajendira Varathan
Respondent(s)
Krishna Gounder Advocate - N.Kannadasan
Gokulanathan
Adv. N.Kannadasan
Logabalan
Adv. N.Kannadasan
Panneer selvam
Adv. N.Kannadasan
Kavitha
Adv. N.Kannadasan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 17-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 21-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
This is a property dispute case heard on April 21, 2026, involving testimony from the defendant's second witness (Panneerselvan, age 53). The witness testified regarding a family property partition dispute, acknowledging that the petitioner and his father orally divided property in 1976, but denying that the respondent (Krishna Gounder) received his rightful share when the siblings re-partitioned properties on July 26, 2021. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination testimony under oath per the Indian Evidence Act 1969, with the witness disputing claims that the partition was conducted fairly and acknowledging potential irregularities in how ancestral property was divided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a property dispute case heard on April 21, 2026, involving testimony from the defendant's second witness (Panneerselvan, age 53). The witness testified regarding a family property partition dispute, acknowledging that the petitioner and his father orally divided property in 1976, but denying that the respondent (Krishna Gounder) received his rightful share when the siblings re-partitioned properties on July 26, 2021. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination testimony under oath per the Indian Evidence Act 1969, with the witness disputing claims that the partition was conducted fairly and acknowledging potential irregularities in how ancestral property was divided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts