Avalurpet SHO vs SARAVANAN — 871/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(2),427. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Enquiry Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP180019712025

e-Filing Number

30-08-2025

Filing Number

1968/2025

Filing Date

30-Aug-2025

Registration No

871/2025

Registration Date

19-Sep-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

386

Police Station

Avalurpet P.S.

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(2),427
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Avalurpet SHO (Station House Officer)

    Adv. APP Gr.II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARAVANAN

  2. 2.RENUGA

  3. 3.MURUGAN

  4. 4.MADHANKUMAR

  5. 5.RANJITHKUMAR

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 04-May-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.871/2025 On 16.03.2026, the court affirmed a criminal petition involving allegations that on a 2023 incident, respondents Saravanan, Renuga, Murugan and others assaulted and threatened the complainant and another person, causing injuries requiring hospital treatment. The court's order appears to acknowledge the witness testimony and confirms that the accused admitted to the charges as presented. The matter was disposed of with the court's affirmation of the proceedings conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 871/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.871/2025 On 16.03.2026, the court affirmed a criminal petition involving allegations that on a 2023 incident, respondents Saravanan, Renuga, Murugan and others assaulted and threatened the complainant and another person, causing injuries requiring hospital treatment. The court's order appears to acknowledge the witness testimony and confirms that the accused admitted to the charges as presented. The matter was disposed of with the court's affirmation of the proceedings conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case