SHO D4 Avalurpet Ps vs PREMKUMAR — 852/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP180016582025
e-Filing Number
08-08-2025
Filing Number
1655/2025
Filing Date
14-Aug-2025
Registration No
852/2025
Registration Date
14-Aug-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer) D4 Avalurpet Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.PREMKUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Chengalpattu acquitted the accused Permagumaar of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 352, 324, and 506(ii) (obscene language, criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation) and discharged him under BNSS Section 271(1). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony was inconsistent and contradictory, and the remaining documentary evidence was insufficient to establish the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 852/2025
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Chengalpattu acquitted the accused Permagumaar of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 352, 324, and 506(ii) (obscene language, criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation) and discharged him under BNSS Section 271(1). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony was inconsistent and contradictory, and the remaining documentary evidence was insufficient to establish the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts