Murugan vs Sathiyamangalam SHO — 142/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP180007172026

Filing Number

716/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

89

Police Station

Sathiyamangalam P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugan

    Adv. K.Ravichandiran,M.com.,.B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sathiyamangalam SHO (Station House Officer)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 142/2026: The Judicial Magistrate Court of Gingee granted bail to Murugan, who was arrested and remanded for offenses under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(2). The court found that investigation was partially complete, the injured person had been discharged, and continued detention was unnecessary. Bail was granted with conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, non-commission of similar offenses, and non-absconding during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 142/2026: The Judicial Magistrate Court of Gingee granted bail to Murugan, who was arrested and remanded for offenses under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(2). The court found that investigation was partially complete, the injured person had been discharged, and continued detention was unnecessary. Bail was granted with conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, non-commission of similar offenses, and non-absconding during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case