Thamim vs Valathy SHO — 139/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP180007142026

Filing Number

713/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

139/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

70

Police Station

Valathi P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thamim

    Adv. Tr. S.Balaji., B.Com.,LLB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Valathy SHO (Station House Officer)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Fair OrderView PDF

    Case 139/2026 Summary: The court allowed Thamim's petition to recover his seized Honda Activa (Reg. No. TN-25-BC-9084) in interim custody pending trial for alleged COTPA violations. The court found Thamim to be the registered owner and reasoned that prolonged police custody reduces vehicle utility, citing *Sunderbhai Ambala Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The vehicle was released subject to conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bond with two sureties, deposit of RC book, vehicle photographs, and undertakings not to alienate or encumber the vehicle without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 139/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 139/2026 Summary: The court allowed Thamim's petition to recover his seized Honda Activa (Reg. No. TN-25-BC-9084) in interim custody pending trial for alleged COTPA violations. The court found Thamim to be the registered owner and reasoned that prolonged police custody reduces vehicle utility, citing *Sunderbhai Ambala Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The vehicle was released subject to conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bond with two sureties, deposit of RC book, vehicle photographs, and undertakings not to alienate or encumber the vehicle without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case