Elumalai vs Gingee P.S — 137/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP180007122026

Filing Number

711/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

137/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

Gingee P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Elumalai

    Adv. M.Palani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gingee P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court in Gingee allowed Elumalai's bail petition in a case involving charges under Section 303(2) of the BNS. The court found that after 60 days in judicial custody, continued detention was unnecessary as investigation was substantially complete and police had no serious objections. Elumalai was released on bail with conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and restrictions against tampering with evidence, absconding, or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 137/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court in Gingee allowed Elumalai's bail petition in a case involving charges under Section 303(2) of the BNS. The court found that after 60 days in judicial custody, continued detention was unnecessary as investigation was substantially complete and police had no serious objections. Elumalai was released on bail with conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and restrictions against tampering with evidence, absconding, or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case