Thamizhazhagan vs Gingee P.S — 113/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVP180006582026
Filing Number
657/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
113/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
352
Police Station
Gingee P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thamizhazhagan
Adv. A.Rajavelu
Respondent(s)
Gingee P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Orders
Service Pending-Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 13-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 05-03-2026 | Orders |
| 03-03-2026 | Service Pending-Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.113/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate allowed Thamizhagan's petition and granted him interim custody of the seized JCB vehicle (Reg. No. TN-32-AC-1099), finding him to be the absolute registered owner. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody diminishes vehicle utility and accepted the Supreme Court's precedent requiring magistrates to release seized vehicles with appropriate safeguards. Conditions: Release was granted subject to: (1) Rs. 10 lakh bond with two sureties; (2) deposit of original RC book; (3) photographs/CD of all sides; (4) undertaking to produce vehicle as required; and (5) undertaking not to alienate or encumber the vehicle until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.113/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate allowed Thamizhagan's petition and granted him interim custody of the seized JCB vehicle (Reg. No. TN-32-AC-1099), finding him to be the absolute registered owner. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody diminishes vehicle utility and accepted the Supreme Court's precedent requiring magistrates to release seized vehicles with appropriate safeguards. Conditions: Release was granted subject to: (1) Rs. 10 lakh bond with two sureties; (2) deposit of original RC book; (3) photographs/CD of all sides; (4) undertaking to produce vehicle as required; and (5) undertaking not to alienate or encumber the vehicle until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts