Thamizhazhagan vs Gingee P.S — 113/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP180006582026

Case disposed

Filing Number

657/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

113/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

352

Police Station

Gingee P.S.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

Thamizhazhagan

Adv. A.Rajavelu

Respondent(s)

Gingee P.S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate

18-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

For further Proceedings

13-03-2026

For further Proceedings

05-03-2026

Orders

03-03-2026

Service Pending-Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Fair Order

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.113/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate allowed Thamizhagan's petition and granted him interim custody of the seized JCB vehicle (Reg. No. TN-32-AC-1099), finding him to be the absolute registered owner. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody diminishes vehicle utility and accepted the Supreme Court's precedent requiring magistrates to release seized vehicles with appropriate safeguards. Conditions: Release was granted subject to: (1) Rs. 10 lakh bond with two sureties; (2) deposit of original RC book; (3) photographs/CD of all sides; (4) undertaking to produce vehicle as required; and (5) undertaking not to alienate or encumber the vehicle until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.113/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate allowed Thamizhagan's petition and granted him interim custody of the seized JCB vehicle (Reg. No. TN-32-AC-1099), finding him to be the absolute registered owner. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody diminishes vehicle utility and accepted the Supreme Court's precedent requiring magistrates to release seized vehicles with appropriate safeguards. Conditions: Release was granted subject to: (1) Rs. 10 lakh bond with two sureties; (2) deposit of original RC book; (3) photographs/CD of all sides; (4) undertaking to produce vehicle as required; and (5) undertaking not to alienate or encumber the vehicle until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case