Nallanpillai petral P.S vs Kumaran Advocate - Mr.a.Rajavelu., B.A., B.L., — 173/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b)147,324,506(ii)IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP180004332018

Filing Number

430/2018

Filing Date

07-Sep-2018

Registration No

173/2018

Registration Date

12-Sep-2018

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

88

Police Station

Nallanpillai petral P.S.

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b)147,324,506(ii)IPC
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KumaranNallanpillai petral P.S
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KumaranNallanpillai petral P.S
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KumaranNallanpillai petral P.S
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KumaranNallanpillai petral P.S
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Nallanpillai petral P.S
Mp/7/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KumaranNallanpillai petral P.S
Mp/8/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KumaranNallanpillai petral P.S
Mp/10/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KumaranNallanpillai petral P.S
Mp/11/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KumaranNallanpillai petral P.S
Mp/12/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KumaranNallanpillai petral P.S

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nallanpillai petral P.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kumaran Advocate - Mr.a.Rajavelu., B.A., B.L.,

  2. 2.Krishnamoorthy

  3. 3.Boobalan

  4. 4.Ramachandiran

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No.173/2018 Court Decision: The court acquitted all five accused (Kumaran, Krishnamoorthy, Boobalan, Ramachendran, and Ammu Valli) under IPC Sections 147, 324, and 506(2), finding them not guilty and ordering their release under Section 248(1) CrPC. The court determined that while a conflict occurred between the accused and the complainant (Nallanpillai/Chakravarthy) on 06.06.2016 concerning a land dispute, the prosecution failed to establish who was the aggressor, citing a breach of Police Standing Order 588 which requires identifying the primary offender in mutual conflict cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 30-Dec-2025

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 12-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 22-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 07-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 07-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 23-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 10-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 20-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 01-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 01-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 17-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 17-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 10-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 02-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 07-May-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 24-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 03-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 31-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 18-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 25-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 13-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 16-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 12-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 13-Jun-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 17-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 10-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 22-Apr-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  40. 22-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  41. 19-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  42. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  43. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  44. 04-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  45. 13-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  46. 15-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  47. 14-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  48. 05-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  49. 01-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  50. 07-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  51. 12-Jul-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  52. 12-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  53. 05-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  54. 22-May-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  55. 10-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  56. 01-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  57. 03-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  58. 02-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  59. 02-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  60. 23-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  61. 28-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  62. 10-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  63. 02-Sep-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  64. 02-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  65. 26-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  66. 25-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  67. 04-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  68. 27-May-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  69. 23-May-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  70. 06-Apr-2022

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  71. 03-Feb-2022

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  72. 23-Dec-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  73. 08-Nov-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  74. 04-Oct-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  75. 05-Aug-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  76. 17-Jun-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  77. 27-Apr-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  78. 01-Mar-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  79. 18-Jan-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  80. 22-Dec-2020

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  81. 05-Nov-2020

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  82. 18-Aug-2020

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  83. 03-Jul-2020

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  84. 09-Jun-2020

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  85. 20-May-2020

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  86. 12-May-2020

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  87. 11-Mar-2020

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  88. 31-Dec-2019

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  89. 28-Nov-2019

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  90. 17-Sep-2019

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  91. 08-Aug-2019

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  92. 27-Jun-2019

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  93. 27-May-2019

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  94. 02-May-2019

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  95. 27-Mar-2019

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  96. 20-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  97. 07-Sep-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 173/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.173/2018 Court Decision: The court acquitted all five accused (Kumaran, Krishnamoorthy, Boobalan, Ramachendran, and Ammu Valli) under IPC Sections 147, 324, and 506(2), finding them not guilty and ordering their release under Section 248(1) CrPC. The court determined that while a conflict occurred between the accused and the complainant (Nallanpillai/Chakravarthy) on 06.06.2016 concerning a land dispute, the prosecution failed to establish who was the aggressor, citing a breach of Police Standing Order 588 which requires identifying the primary offender in mutual conflict cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case