Gingee P.S. vs Veenithiparasuraman — 66/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),354D,506(ii)IPC. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP180003182023
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
317/2023
Filing Date
22-02-2023
Registration No
66/2023
Registration Date
22-02-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
257
Police Station
Gingee P.S.
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gingee P.S.
Adv. Tr.Sakthivel, APP.Gr.II
Respondent(s)
Veenithiparasuraman
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 27-01-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-12-2025 | Part Heard |
| 03-11-2025 | Part Heard |
| 18-09-2025 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: C.C. 66/2023 The petitioner (Gingee Police Station) filed a case against the respondent (Veenithiparasuraman) based on allegations of harassment and intimidation. The complainant, a Senior Administrative Assistant at Gingee Sub-Court, alleged that the respondent had engaged in prolonged criminal harassment, including abusive language, threats, and intimidation over several incidents from May 2020 onwards. The case was examined through witness testimony and cross-examination. The court found the respondent's conduct substantiated based on the complainant's testimony and investigation findings, and the case proceeded to adjudication on the merits of the criminal charges presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C. 66/2023 The petitioner (Gingee Police Station) filed a case against the respondent (Veenithiparasuraman) based on allegations of harassment and intimidation. The complainant, a Senior Administrative Assistant at Gingee Sub-Court, alleged that the respondent had engaged in prolonged criminal harassment, including abusive language, threats, and intimidation over several incidents from May 2020 onwards. The case was examined through witness testimony and cross-examination. The court found the respondent's conduct substantiated based on the complainant's testimony and investigation findings, and the case proceeded to adjudication on the merits of the criminal charges presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts