Gingee P.S. vs Veenithiparasuraman — 66/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),354D,506(ii)IPC. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 13-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP180003182023

Filing Number

317/2023

Filing Date

22-Feb-2023

Registration No

66/2023

Registration Date

22-Feb-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

257

Police Station

Gingee P.S.

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),354D,506(ii)IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gingee P.S.

    Adv. Tr.Sakthivel, APP.Gr.II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Veenithiparasuraman

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 27-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 01-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 03-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 18-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 04-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 18-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 06-May-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 28-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 19-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 28-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 30-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 08-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 25-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 07-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 02-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 04-Jun-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 10-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 08-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 19-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 09-Jan-2024

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C. 66/2023 The petitioner (Gingee Police Station) filed a case against the respondent (Veenithiparasuraman) based on allegations of harassment and intimidation. The complainant, a Senior Administrative Assistant at Gingee Sub-Court, alleged that the respondent had engaged in prolonged criminal harassment, including abusive language, threats, and intimidation over several incidents from May 2020 onwards. The case was examined through witness testimony and cross-examination. The court found the respondent's conduct substantiated based on the complainant's testimony and investigation findings, and the case proceeded to adjudication on the merits of the criminal charges presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 09-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 04-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 01-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 08-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 12-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 23-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 28-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 03-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 08-Jun-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 16-May-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 27-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 22-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. 66/2023 The petitioner (Gingee Police Station) filed a case against the respondent (Veenithiparasuraman) based on allegations of harassment and intimidation. The complainant, a Senior Administrative Assistant at Gingee Sub-Court, alleged that the respondent had engaged in prolonged criminal harassment, including abusive language, threats, and intimidation over several incidents from May 2020 onwards. The case was examined through witness testimony and cross-examination. The court found the respondent's conduct substantiated based on the complainant's testimony and investigation findings, and the case proceeded to adjudication on the merits of the criminal charges presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case