SHO BRAMMADESAM PS 371 2023 vs UMAPATHI — 687/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,353,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP110029832025
e-Filing Number
10-10-2025
Filing Number
2983/2025
Filing Date
13-Oct-2025
Registration No
687/2025
Registration Date
14-Oct-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No.II Court, Tindivanam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate II
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
371
Police Station
Brammadesam P.S.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer) BRAMMADESAM PS (Police Station) 371 2023
Respondent(s)
-
1.UMAPATHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: CC 687/2025 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Umapathi of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 353, and 506(ii), finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the complainant (PW-1), who filed the complaint, failed to provide credible testimony regarding the alleged assault and threats, and the eyewitnesses similarly offered no substantive evidence supporting the prosecution's case, rendering the charges unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate II
-
17-Apr-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate II
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate II
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate II
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate II
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate II
-
12-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate II
-
02-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate II
-
31-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate II
-
14-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 687/2025
Case Summary: CC 687/2025 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Umapathi of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 353, and 506(ii), finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the complainant (PW-1), who filed the complaint, failed to provide credible testimony regarding the alleged assault and threats, and the eyewitnesses similarly offered no substantive evidence supporting the prosecution's case, rendering the charges unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts