Roshanai SHO vs Gnanaprakasam — 181/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,353,506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP100055042024
e-Filing Number
08-10-2024
Filing Number
5473/2024
Filing Date
19-10-2024
Registration No
181/2024
Registration Date
19-10-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
589
Police Station
Roshanai P.S.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Roshanai SHO (Station House Officer)
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Roshanai police station
Respondent(s)
Gnanaprakasam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate I
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-06-2026 | Judgement |
| 04-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-05-2026 | Questioning |
| 08-05-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case CC 181/2024 The court acquitted defendant Gnanaprakasam of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 353 (assault on public servant), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The judge found that while the prosecution presented witness testimony from a police officer (PW-1) claiming the defendant abused and assaulted him on November 14, 2023, critical corroborating evidence was absent—the defendant's brothers mentioned in the complaint were never examined as witnesses, the officer's duty roster was not produced, and eyewitness accounts were contradictory or non-committal. The defendant was accordingly acquitted and discharged under BNS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case CC 181/2024 The court acquitted defendant Gnanaprakasam of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 353 (assault on public servant), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The judge found that while the prosecution presented witness testimony from a police officer (PW-1) claiming the defendant abused and assaulted him on November 14, 2023, critical corroborating evidence was absent—the defendant's brothers mentioned in the complaint were never examined as witnesses, the officer's duty roster was not produced, and eyewitness accounts were contradictory or non-committal. The defendant was accordingly acquitted and discharged under BNS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts