SHO TINDIVANAM 512 23 vs Tamilarasan — 175/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506(2),323,447,294(b),324. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP100054532024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

15-10-2024

Filing Number

5422/2024

Filing Date

16-10-2024

Registration No

175/2024

Registration Date

16-10-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate I

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

512

Police Station

Tindivanam P.S.

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 506(2),323,447,294(b),324
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4
Mp/1/2026 Classification : 320 Cr.pc Section SHO TINDIVANAM 512 23Tamilarasan

Petitioner(s)

SHO (Station House Officer) TINDIVANAM 512 23

Adv. Sub inspector of police Tindivanam police station

Respondent(s)

Tamilarasan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate I

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Questioning

12-03-2026

Remand

11-03-2026

Remand

10-03-2026

Remand

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: CC 175/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Tamilarasan of all charges under IPC sections 447, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(1), and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act section 4, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding who was assaulted, when, and where during the alleged November 1, 2023 incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

02-03-2026
Deposition
13-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 175/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Tamilarasan of all charges under IPC sections 447, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(1), and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act section 4, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding who was assaulted, when, and where during the alleged November 1, 2023 incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case