SHO TINDIVANAM 512 23 vs Tamilarasan — 175/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506(2),323,447,294(b),324. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP100054532024

e-Filing Number

15-10-2024

Filing Number

5422/2024

Filing Date

16-Oct-2024

Registration No

175/2024

Registration Date

16-Oct-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate I

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

512

Police Station

Tindivanam P.S.

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 506(2),323,447,294(b),324
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) TINDIVANAM 512 23

    Adv. Sub inspector of police Tindivanam police station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tamilarasan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 175/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Tamilarasan of all charges under IPC sections 447, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(1), and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act section 4, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding who was assaulted, when, and where during the alleged November 1, 2023 incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate I

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate I

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate I

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate I

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate I

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate I

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate I

  11. 02-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 02-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate I

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  15. 19-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  16. 02-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate I

  17. 08-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate I

  18. 12-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate I

  19. 05-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate I

  20. 24-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  21. 10-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  22. 15-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  23. 20-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  24. 02-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  25. 21-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  26. 23-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  27. 28-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  28. 20-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  29. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  30. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  31. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  32. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  33. 27-Jan-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate I

  34. 20-Jan-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate I

  35. 30-Dec-2024

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate I

  36. 17-Dec-2024

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate I

  37. 13-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate I

  38. 16-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 16-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 175/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 175/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Tamilarasan of all charges under IPC sections 447, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(1), and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act section 4, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding who was assaulted, when, and where during the alleged November 1, 2023 incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case