TINDIVANAM 30 of 2025 vs Akash Appu — 681/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),126(2),132,121(1), 115(2),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 29th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP100030842025
e-Filing Number
28-11-2025
Filing Number
3071/2025
Filing Date
06-Dec-2025
Registration No
681/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
300
Police Station
Tindivanam P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TINDIVANAM 30 of 2025
Adv. Sub inspector of police Tindivanam police station
Respondent(s)
-
1.Akash Appu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: CC 681/2025 Court Decision: The Tindivanam Magistrate Court acquitted all accused (Akash Appu and three others) under sections 296(b), 126(2), 132, 121(1), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3) BNS. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Inconsistencies in witness testimonies—particularly regarding who attacked whom, the weapon used, and the exact incident location—created sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal under section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-May-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-May-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate I
-
22-May-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate I
-
20-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
13-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
07-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
04-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
29-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
27-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
20-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
15-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
08-Apr-2026
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-Apr-2026
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
12-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
09-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
04-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
28-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
21-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
07-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
05-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
29-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Dec-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate I
-
18-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate I
-
10-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate I
-
08-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 681/2025
Case Summary: CC 681/2025 Court Decision: The Tindivanam Magistrate Court acquitted all accused (Akash Appu and three others) under sections 296(b), 126(2), 132, 121(1), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3) BNS. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Inconsistencies in witness testimonies—particularly regarding who attacked whom, the weapon used, and the exact incident location—created sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal under section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts