Vellimedupettai PS Cr No 264 of 2024 vs Visal — 742/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3),127(2). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP100024012025

Part Heard

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

07-10-2025

Filing Number

2388/2025

Filing Date

09-10-2025

Registration No

742/2025

Registration Date

31-12-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate I

FIR Details

FIR Number

264

Police Station

VellimeduPettai P.S.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3),127(2)

Petitioner(s)

Vellimedupettai PS (Police Station) Cr No 264 of 2024

Respondent(s)

Visal

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate I

12-06-2026

Part Heard

08-06-2026

Part Heard

05-06-2026

Part Heard

13-05-2026

Part Heard

11-05-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

08-04-2026
Deposition
16-03-2026
Deposition
25-03-2026
Deposition
08-05-2026
Deposition
05-06-2026
Deposition

This document is a witness deposition (PW-8) recorded on 05.06.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tindivanam in Case CC. 742/2025. The witness, a 45-year-old from the village, testified regarding an alleged theft incident involving a bracelet. The witness identified the bracelet as his own property and testified that the accused took it approximately two years prior. The deposition was recorded with all three accused present and defense counsel present, though the APP was absent. No final order granting or denying bail, dismissing or allowing the petition is stated in this document—it is solely a witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition (PW-8) recorded on 05.06.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tindivanam in Case CC. 742/2025. The witness, a 45-year-old from the village, testified regarding an alleged theft incident involving a bracelet. The witness identified the bracelet as his own property and testified that the accused took it approximately two years prior. The deposition was recorded with all three accused present and defense counsel present, though the APP was absent. No final order granting or denying bail, dismissing or allowing the petition is stated in this document—it is solely a witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case