Vellimedupettai PS Cr No 264 of 2024 vs Visal — 742/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3),127(2). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP100024012025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-10-2025
Filing Number
2388/2025
Filing Date
09-10-2025
Registration No
742/2025
Registration Date
31-12-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
FIR Details
FIR Number
264
Police Station
VellimeduPettai P.S.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vellimedupettai PS (Police Station) Cr No 264 of 2024
Respondent(s)
Visal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate I
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Part Heard |
| 08-06-2026 | Part Heard |
| 05-06-2026 | Part Heard |
| 13-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-05-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition (PW-8) recorded on 05.06.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tindivanam in Case CC. 742/2025. The witness, a 45-year-old from the village, testified regarding an alleged theft incident involving a bracelet. The witness identified the bracelet as his own property and testified that the accused took it approximately two years prior. The deposition was recorded with all three accused present and defense counsel present, though the APP was absent. No final order granting or denying bail, dismissing or allowing the petition is stated in this document—it is solely a witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition (PW-8) recorded on 05.06.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tindivanam in Case CC. 742/2025. The witness, a 45-year-old from the village, testified regarding an alleged theft incident involving a bracelet. The witness identified the bracelet as his own property and testified that the accused took it approximately two years prior. The deposition was recorded with all three accused present and defense counsel present, though the APP was absent. No final order granting or denying bail, dismissing or allowing the petition is stated in this document—it is solely a witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts