Roshanai PS vs Nagaraj Advocate - R. shanmugam, R. shanmugam — 258/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(i),353. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP100008382020
Filing Number
838/2020
Filing Date
30-12-2020
Registration No
258/2020
Registration Date
30-12-2020
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Roshanai PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP GR II
Respondent(s)
Nagaraj Advocate - R. shanmugam, R. shanmugam
Venkatesan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate I
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Questioning
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 06-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted two defendants (Nagaraj and Venkatesen) charged under IPC sections 294(b), 353, and 506(1) for abusing and threatening a police officer at a hospital in May 2019. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing significant inconsistencies in witness testimony—key witnesses contradicted the victim's account, and crucial evidence like CCTV footage and the alleged private ambulance driver were never produced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted two defendants (Nagaraj and Venkatesen) charged under IPC sections 294(b), 353, and 506(1) for abusing and threatening a police officer at a hospital in May 2019. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing significant inconsistencies in witness testimony—key witnesses contradicted the victim's account, and crucial evidence like CCTV footage and the alleged private ambulance driver were never produced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts