SHO TINDIVANAM vs Rajendhiran — 78/2025

Copy of JudgmentView PDF

Case Summary: CC 78/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Rajendhiran and Rajkumar) of all charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 353, and 506(1), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The defendants were released under Section 271(1) BNSS. Key Reasoning: Despite witness testimony of an alleged assault on a police vehicle driver on 14.06.2021, critical evidentiary gaps undermined the case—no identification documents were seized, witnesses gave contradictory accounts, two defense witnesses testified they knew nothing of the incident, and no evidence showed how the complainant's duty was disrupted by the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Judicial Magistrate I

Judgement

Judicial Magistrate I

Evidence

Judicial Magistrate I

DepositionView PDF

Questioning

Judicial Magistrate I

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

DepositionView PDF

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

DepositionView PDF

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

DepositionView PDF

Part Heard

Judicial Magistrate I

DepositionView PDF

Trial

Judicial Magistrate I

Trial

Judicial Magistrate I

Framing of Charges

Judicial Magistrate I

Service Pending-Summon

Judicial Magistrate I

Service Pending-Summon

Judicial Magistrate I

Appearance

Judicial Magistrate I

Appearance

Judicial Magistrate I

Appearance

Judicial Magistrate I

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 78/2025