Murugan (a) Vilandhai Murugan vs Tindivanam Ps — 187/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP100004102026

Filing Number

408/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

187/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate I

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

332

Police Station

Tindivanam P.S.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugan (a) Vilandhai Murugan

    Adv. T. Magesh Babu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tindivanam Ps (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Fair Order

    Case Summary: 187/2026 The court granted bail to Murugan @ Vilandhai Murugan, accused under Section 303(2) BNS, who had been in judicial custody for 7 months 17 days. Despite prosecution objections citing the grave nature of the offense and risk of witness tampering, the court allowed the petition, finding the extended incarceration period sufficient for fair investigation. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including monthly court appearances and prohibitions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate I

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 187/2026 The court granted bail to Murugan @ Vilandhai Murugan, accused under Section 303(2) BNS, who had been in judicial custody for 7 months 17 days. Despite prosecution objections citing the grave nature of the offense and risk of witness tampering, the court allowed the petition, finding the extended incarceration period sufficient for fair investigation. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including monthly court appearances and prohibitions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case