RP in Cr. No. 75/2026 of Tindivanam Ps - Venkatesan vs Tindivanam Ps — 165/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497, 503. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVP100003792026
Filing Number
379/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
165/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
Tindivanam P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RP in Cr. No. 75/2026 of Tindivanam Ps (Police Station) - Venkatesan
Adv. Sakthivannan A
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tindivanam Ps (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Fair OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 165/2026 The Tindivanam court allowed Venkatesan's petition to recover an approximately 15.8-gram gold chain seized as case property in a theft complaint, granting interim custody subject to conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's objection, following Supreme Court precedent that seized property belonging to the owner can be returned with safeguards to prevent misuse. Conditions imposed: Venkatesan must execute a bond of Rs. 1,71,000, submit photographs and panchanama of the property, and provide an affidavit guaranteeing non-alienation and production at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-Apr-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
01-Apr-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Mar-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Mar-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
16-Mar-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 165/2026
Case Summary: 165/2026 The Tindivanam court allowed Venkatesan's petition to recover an approximately 15.8-gram gold chain seized as case property in a theft complaint, granting interim custody subject to conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's objection, following Supreme Court precedent that seized property belonging to the owner can be returned with safeguards to prevent misuse. Conditions imposed: Venkatesan must execute a bond of Rs. 1,71,000, submit photographs and panchanama of the property, and provide an affidavit guaranteeing non-alienation and production at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts