RP in Cr. No. 75/2026 of Tindivanam Ps - Venkatesan vs Tindivanam Ps — 165/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497, 503. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP100003792026

Case disposed

Filing Number

379/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

165/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate I

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

Tindivanam P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497, 503

Petitioner(s)

RP in Cr. No. 75/2026 of Tindivanam Ps (Police Station) - Venkatesan

Adv. Sakthivannan A

Respondent(s)

Tindivanam Ps (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate I

10-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Await Notice

01-04-2026

Await Notice

26-03-2026

Await Notice

23-03-2026

Await Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Fair Order

Case Summary: 165/2026 The Tindivanam court allowed Venkatesan's petition to recover an approximately 15.8-gram gold chain seized as case property in a theft complaint, granting interim custody subject to conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's objection, following Supreme Court precedent that seized property belonging to the owner can be returned with safeguards to prevent misuse. Conditions imposed: Venkatesan must execute a bond of Rs. 1,71,000, submit photographs and panchanama of the property, and provide an affidavit guaranteeing non-alienation and production at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 165/2026 The Tindivanam court allowed Venkatesan's petition to recover an approximately 15.8-gram gold chain seized as case property in a theft complaint, granting interim custody subject to conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's objection, following Supreme Court precedent that seized property belonging to the owner can be returned with safeguards to prevent misuse. Conditions imposed: Venkatesan must execute a bond of Rs. 1,71,000, submit photographs and panchanama of the property, and provide an affidavit guaranteeing non-alienation and production at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case