RP in Cr. No. 4/2026 of Tindivanam Ps - Murugan vs Tindivanam Ps — 120/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497, 530. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVP100003062026
Filing Number
306/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
120/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Tindivanam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
Tindivanam P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RP in Cr. No. 4/2026 of Tindivanam Ps (Police Station) - Murugan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tindivanam Ps (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Fair OrderView PDF
Case 120/2026 Summary The court allowed Murugan's petition for interim custody of a 24-gram gold chain seized in a theft case (Cr. No. 4/2026), finding him to be the rightful owner. The court imposed conditions including a bond of Rs. 2,10,000, an affidavit undertaking not to alienate the property, photography documentation, and agreement to produce the property at trial, following Supreme Court guidelines from Sunderbhai Ambalal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Mar-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
09-Mar-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Mar-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Mar-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Feb-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
20-Feb-2026
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 120/2026
Case 120/2026 Summary The court allowed Murugan's petition for interim custody of a 24-gram gold chain seized in a theft case (Cr. No. 4/2026), finding him to be the rightful owner. The court imposed conditions including a bond of Rs. 2,10,000, an affidavit undertaking not to alienate the property, photography documentation, and agreement to produce the property at trial, following Supreme Court guidelines from Sunderbhai Ambalal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts