Shriram Transport Finance Limited vs Udayakumar — 458/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21 37, 38. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNVP020040832024
e-Filing Number
29-10-2024
Filing Number
2637/2024
Filing Date
13-Nov-2024
Registration No
458/2024
Registration Date
03-Dec-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shriram Transport Finance Limited
Adv. Kalaiarasi D
Respondent(s)
-
1.Udayakumar
Case History
-
23-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary Witness PW1 (Arularaj, a Revenue Manager, age 46 from Villupuram) testified on 11.2.2026 in EP.No.458/2024 in ARC.968/2018 before the Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram. The witness's examination-in-chief was recorded, and cross-examination was not conducted as the opposing party remained absent. The witness statement was recorded in open court, read over, and acknowledged as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
Orders
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Jan-2025
Batta
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Jan-2025
Appearance
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 458/2024
Summary Witness PW1 (Arularaj, a Revenue Manager, age 46 from Villupuram) testified on 11.2.2026 in EP.No.458/2024 in ARC.968/2018 before the Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram. The witness's examination-in-chief was recorded, and cross-examination was not conducted as the opposing party remained absent. The witness statement was recorded in open court, read over, and acknowledged as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts