State Bank of India ADB, Villupuram by its Chief Manager vs Ranganathan — 1264/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Returned on 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVP020036652024
e-Filing Number
13-09-2024
Filing Number
2378/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
1264/2024
Registration Date
30-10-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Returned
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of India ADB, Villupuram by its Chief Manager
Adv. CHELLAPPA K.V.D.
Respondent(s)
Ranganathan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-06-2026 | Judgement |
| 15-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
Case 1264/2024 Summary In this debt recovery case before the Principal Subordinate Court of Villupuram, the State Bank of India ADB sought to recover dues from defendant Ranganathan on a loan with hypothecation agreement for Rs. 50,000 executed in 2014. The bank's Chief Manager (PW1) testified on 16.03.2026, presenting documentary evidence including the loan application, hypothecation agreement, multiple revival letters (2017, 2023), legal notice (March 2024), and account statements. The defendant failed to appear, resulting in ex parte proceedings with no cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 1264/2024 Summary In this debt recovery case before the Principal Subordinate Court of Villupuram, the State Bank of India ADB sought to recover dues from defendant Ranganathan on a loan with hypothecation agreement for Rs. 50,000 executed in 2014. The bank's Chief Manager (PW1) testified on 16.03.2026, presenting documentary evidence including the loan application, hypothecation agreement, multiple revival letters (2017, 2023), legal notice (March 2024), and account statements. The defendant failed to appear, resulting in ex parte proceedings with no cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts