Sivagananam vs Senthilkumar — 49/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNVP020035372024

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

2279/2024

Filing Date

23-09-2024

Registration No

49/2024

Registration Date

23-09-2024

Court

Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram

Judge

4-I Additional Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b)

Petitioner(s)

Sivagananam

Adv. Subramanian. T.S.

Respondent(s)

Senthilkumar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-I Additional Sub Judge

28-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

25-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

16-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

16-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

20-12-2024
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: A.S.No.49/2024 (IA.No.2/2024) - Sivagnanam v. Senthilkumar The appellate court allowed the interim injunction application. Sivagnanam, the unsuccessful plaintiff in the original suit, sought an ad-interim injunction during appeal to restrain Senthilkumar from interfering with his possession of disputed land (Survey No.268/3B). The court found Sivagnanam established a prima facie case based on his patta (land record) and sale documents, determined the balance of convenience favored him, and concluded he would suffer irreparable loss if dispossessed. Senthilkumar is restrained from interfering with Sivagnanam's possession pending appeal disposal; Sivagnanam must preserve the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.S.No.49/2024 (IA.No.2/2024) - Sivagnanam v. Senthilkumar The appellate court allowed the interim injunction application. Sivagnanam, the unsuccessful plaintiff in the original suit, sought an ad-interim injunction during appeal to restrain Senthilkumar from interfering with his possession of disputed land (Survey No.268/3B). The court found Sivagnanam established a prima facie case based on his patta (land record) and sale documents, determined the balance of convenience favored him, and concluded he would suffer irreparable loss if dispossessed. Senthilkumar is restrained from interfering with Sivagnanam's possession pending appeal disposal; Sivagnanam must preserve the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case