SHO Taluk Police Station, Villupuram vs Vasanthakumar — 264/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 397. Status: Service Pending-Warrant. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNVP020019322023
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
235/2023
Filing Date
04-10-2023
Registration No
264/2023
Registration Date
07-10-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
Villupuram Taluk P.S
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) Taluk Police Station, Villupuram
Adv. Addl. Public Prosecutor(Karthikeyan)
Respondent(s)
Vasanthakumar
StepanRaj
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge
Service Pending-Warrant
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | Service Pending-Warrant |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: S.C.No. 264/2023 On 16.03.2026, the Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram heard witness testimonies in this criminal case. Three prosecution witnesses testified under oath and were cross-examined by the defense. The respondents (Vasanthakumar and StepanRaj) were absent during proceedings. The court admitted an application under Section 317 CrPC. The case involves allegations of dacoity with weapons; witnesses testified about incidents occurring 12-13 years prior but provided inconsistent details regarding dates and circumstances. Cross-examinations raised questions about witness credibility and the reliability of their accounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.No. 264/2023 On 16.03.2026, the Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram heard witness testimonies in this criminal case. Three prosecution witnesses testified under oath and were cross-examined by the defense. The respondents (Vasanthakumar and StepanRaj) were absent during proceedings. The court admitted an application under Section 317 CrPC. The case involves allegations of dacoity with weapons; witnesses testified about incidents occurring 12-13 years prior but provided inconsistent details regarding dates and circumstances. Cross-examinations raised questions about witness credibility and the reliability of their accounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts