SHO Taluk Police Station, Villupuram vs Vasanthakumar — 264/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 397. Status: Service Pending-Warrant. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNVP020019322023
Filing Number
235/2023
Filing Date
04-Oct-2023
Registration No
264/2023
Registration Date
07-Oct-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
Villupuram Taluk P.S
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer) Taluk Police Station, Villupuram
Adv. Addl. Public Prosecutor(Karthikeyan)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vasanthakumar
-
2.StepanRaj
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.No. 264/2023 On 16.03.2026, the Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram heard witness testimonies in this criminal case. Three prosecution witnesses testified under oath and were cross-examined by the defense. The respondents (Vasanthakumar and StepanRaj) were absent during proceedings. The court admitted an application under Section 317 CrPC. The case involves allegations of dacoity with weapons; witnesses testified about incidents occurring 12-13 years prior but provided inconsistent details regarding dates and circumstances. Cross-examinations raised questions about witness credibility and the reliability of their accounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Sep-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Jul-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
02-Apr-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Dec-2023
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Nov-2023
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Oct-2023
Appearance
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 264/2023
Case Summary: S.C.No. 264/2023 On 16.03.2026, the Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram heard witness testimonies in this criminal case. Three prosecution witnesses testified under oath and were cross-examined by the defense. The respondents (Vasanthakumar and StepanRaj) were absent during proceedings. The court admitted an application under Section 317 CrPC. The case involves allegations of dacoity with weapons; witnesses testified about incidents occurring 12-13 years prior but provided inconsistent details regarding dates and circumstances. Cross-examinations raised questions about witness credibility and the reliability of their accounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts