SHO Valavanur Police Station vs Ariu @ Arivazhagan — 189/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNVP020017082023

Case disposed

Filing Number

428/2023

Filing Date

11-08-2023

Registration No

189/2023

Registration Date

18-08-2023

Court

Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram

Judge

3-Principal Sub Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392,34
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ariu @ ArivazhaganSHO Valavanur Police Station
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ariu @ ArivazhaganSHO Valavanur Police Station
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ariu @ ArivazhaganSHO Valavanur Police Station
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section 1) Arivu @ Arigvazhagan, 2)Suresh @ Sukku Suresh1) Arivu @ Arigvazhagan, 2)Suresh @ Sukku Suresh
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ariu @ Arivazhagan(MR), Ariu @ Arivazhagan(MR)Ariu @ Arivazhagan(MR), Ariu @ Arivazhagan(MR)
Mp/7/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ariu @ Arivazhagan Suresh @ Sukku Suresh Manikandan @ Chinaa @ ChinnaManiAriu @ Arivazhagan Suresh @ Sukku Suresh Manikandan @ Chinaa @ ChinnaMani
Mp/8/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ariu @ Arivazhagan Sarath @ SarthrajAriu @ Arivazhagan Sarath @ Sarthraj
Mp/9/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ariu @ ArivazhaganSHO Valavanur Police Station
Mp/10/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SHO Valavanur Police StationAriu @ Arivazhagan
Mp/11/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SHO Valavanur Police StationAriu @ Arivazhagan
Mp/12/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SHO Valavanur Police StationAriu @ Arivazhagan

Petitioner(s)

SHO (Station House Officer) Valavanur Police Station

Adv. Addl. Public Prosecutor(G.K.Karthikeyan)

Respondent(s)

Ariu @ Arivazhagan

Suresh @ Sukku Suresh

Manikandan @ Chinaa @ ChinnaMani

Sarath @ Sarthraj

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Judgement

09-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Questioning

03-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Madras High Court acquitted four accused persons under IPC Section 392 (dacoity) based on insufficient evidence and credibility issues with witnesses, while ordering the seizure of a TVS scooter and imposing personal bonds on the accused. The court found the prosecution's case weak due to contradictory testimonies and determined that criminal charges under Section 235(1) CrPC should be dropped against all four defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

24-09-2025
Deposition
13-02-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Madras High Court acquitted four accused persons under IPC Section 392 (dacoity) based on insufficient evidence and credibility issues with witnesses, while ordering the seizure of a TVS scooter and imposing personal bonds on the accused. The court found the prosecution's case weak due to contradictory testimonies and determined that criminal charges under Section 235(1) CrPC should be dropped against all four defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case