SHO Valavanur Police Station vs Ariu @ Arivazhagan — 189/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNVP020017082023

Filing Number

428/2023

Filing Date

11-Aug-2023

Registration No

189/2023

Registration Date

18-Aug-2023

Court

Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram

Judge

3-Principal Sub Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Valavanur Police Station

    Adv. Addl. Public Prosecutor(G.K.Karthikeyan)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ariu @ Arivazhagan

  2. 2.Suresh @ Sukku Suresh

  3. 3.Manikandan @ Chinaa @ ChinnaMani

  4. 4.Sarath @ Sarthraj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Madras High Court acquitted four accused persons under IPC Section 392 (dacoity) based on insufficient evidence and credibility issues with witnesses, while ordering the seizure of a TVS scooter and imposing personal bonds on the accused. The court found the prosecution's case weak due to contradictory testimonies and determined that criminal charges under Section 235(1) CrPC should be dropped against all four defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Sub Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Principal Sub Judge

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  13. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  14. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  15. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  16. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  17. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  19. 24-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  21. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  22. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  23. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  24. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  25. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  26. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  27. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  28. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  29. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  30. 15-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  31. 20-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  32. 06-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  33. 06-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  34. 24-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  35. 12-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  36. 19-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  37. 05-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  38. 21-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  39. 01-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  40. 18-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  41. 05-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  42. 20-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  43. 02-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  44. 11-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  45. 19-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  46. 25-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  47. 01-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  48. 18-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Principal Sub Judge

  49. 04-Mar-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Principal Sub Judge

  50. 26-Feb-2024

    Issue of Process

    Principal Sub Judge

  51. 12-Feb-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Principal Sub Judge

  52. 22-Jan-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Principal Sub Judge

  53. 20-Dec-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Principal Sub Judge

  54. 24-Nov-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Principal Sub Judge

  55. 01-Nov-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Principal Sub Judge

  56. 16-Oct-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Principal Sub Judge

  57. 03-Oct-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Principal Sub Judge

  58. 11-Sep-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Principal Sub Judge

  59. 25-Aug-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Principal Sub Judge

  60. 18-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 11-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 189/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Madras High Court acquitted four accused persons under IPC Section 392 (dacoity) based on insufficient evidence and credibility issues with witnesses, while ordering the seizure of a TVS scooter and imposing personal bonds on the accused. The court found the prosecution's case weak due to contradictory testimonies and determined that criminal charges under Section 235(1) CrPC should be dropped against all four defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case