Narayanasamy vs Sakthivel — 465/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 16th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVP020008062025
Filing Number
886/2025
Filing Date
14-Jul-2025
Registration No
465/2025
Registration Date
24-Jul-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram
Judge
4-I Additional Sub Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Narayanasamy
Adv. Manivannan. C.A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sakthivel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 465/2025: Narayanasamy v. Sakthivel The court decided that the respondent (Sakthivel) must repay a loan of ₹4,91,035 plus ₹4,00,000 to the petitioner (Narayanasamy). Interest accrues at 9% per annum on the principal amount until settlement, reducing to 6% thereafter, with a 2-month payment period. The court found that the respondent had borrowed ₹4,00,000 on 03.01.2023 for family expenses and property but failed to repay despite multiple demands and subsequent written notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Additional Sub Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
I Additional Sub Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
I Additional Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Await Reports
I Additional Sub Judge
-
05-Nov-2025
Mediation
I Additional Sub Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Written Statement
I Additional Sub Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Written Statement
I Additional Sub Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 465/2025
Summary of Case 465/2025: Narayanasamy v. Sakthivel The court decided that the respondent (Sakthivel) must repay a loan of ₹4,91,035 plus ₹4,00,000 to the petitioner (Narayanasamy). Interest accrues at 9% per annum on the principal amount until settlement, reducing to 6% thereafter, with a 2-month payment period. The court found that the respondent had borrowed ₹4,00,000 on 03.01.2023 for family expenses and property but failed to repay despite multiple demands and subsequent written notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts