State Bank Of India Adb, Villupuram By Its Chief Manager vs Subramani N — 557/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 01st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVP020006142025
e-Filing Number
17-05-2025
Filing Number
661/2025
Filing Date
02-Jun-2025
Registration No
557/2025
Registration Date
22-Sep-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Bank Of India Adb, Villupuram By Its Chief Manager
Adv. CHELLAPPA K.V.D.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Subramani N
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court decreed the suit in favor of State Bank of India against defendant N. Subramani for recovery of Rs. 1,19,671 (principal of Rs. 36,000 borrowed as an agriculture loan in 2013, plus accumulated interest). The court found that documents including the loan application, hypothecation agreement, and revival letters acknowledged by the defendant established the debt, and the defendant's failure to appear and defend the case supported the bank's claim for recovery with 9% interest until decree date and 6% thereafter until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Issue of Process
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 557/2025
The court decreed the suit in favor of State Bank of India against defendant N. Subramani for recovery of Rs. 1,19,671 (principal of Rs. 36,000 borrowed as an agriculture loan in 2013, plus accumulated interest). The court found that documents including the loan application, hypothecation agreement, and revival letters acknowledged by the defendant established the debt, and the defendant's failure to appear and defend the case supported the bank's claim for recovery with 9% interest until decree date and 6% thereafter until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts