State Bank Of India Adb, Villupuram By Its Chief Manager vs Subramani N — 557/2025

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 01st April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVP020006142025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

17-05-2025

Filing Number

661/2025

Filing Date

02-06-2025

Registration No

557/2025

Registration Date

22-09-2025

Court

Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram

Judge

3-Principal Sub Judge

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed with cost

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

State Bank Of India Adb, Villupuram By Its Chief Manager

Adv. CHELLAPPA K.V.D.

Respondent(s)

Subramani N

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge

01-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Judgement

16-03-2026

Judgement

09-03-2026

Ex-Parte Evidence

23-02-2026

Ex-Parte Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court decreed the suit in favor of State Bank of India against defendant N. Subramani for recovery of Rs. 1,19,671 (principal of Rs. 36,000 borrowed as an agriculture loan in 2013, plus accumulated interest). The court found that documents including the loan application, hypothecation agreement, and revival letters acknowledged by the defendant established the debt, and the defendant's failure to appear and defend the case supported the bank's claim for recovery with 9% interest until decree date and 6% thereafter until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

The court decreed the suit in favor of State Bank of India against defendant N. Subramani for recovery of Rs. 1,19,671 (principal of Rs. 36,000 borrowed as an agriculture loan in 2013, plus accumulated interest). The court found that documents including the loan application, hypothecation agreement, and revival letters acknowledged by the defendant established the debt, and the defendant's failure to appear and defend the case supported the bank's claim for recovery with 9% interest until decree date and 6% thereafter until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case