SHO Taluk Police Station , Villupuram vs Venkatesh — 27/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),342,323,324,326,506(ii),307. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNVP020001852024
Filing Number
26/2024
Filing Date
23-Jan-2024
Registration No
27/2024
Registration Date
23-Jan-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1304
Police Station
Villupuram Taluk P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer) Taluk Police Station , Villupuram
Adv. Subramanian. T.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Venkatesh
-
2.Subramaniyan
-
3.Chellappan
-
4.Vinayagamoorthy
-
5.Devi
-
6.Chithira
-
7.Valarmathi
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Deposition
-
20-Jan-2026
Deposition
Case Summary: S.C.No. 27/2024 On 20.01.2026, the Principal Subordinate Judge of Villupuram conducted witness examination in this case involving SHO Taluk Police Station against Venkatesh and Subramaniyan and Chellappan. The witness (Santhuru Matham, age 25) testified regarding an incident on 18.10.2021 involving alleged possession of weapons (knife and iron rod), with the witness denying direct responsibility and claiming police coercion in obtaining signatures on statements. The cross-examination recorded the witness's contradictory statements regarding document preparation and signature authenticity. The examination was completed on the date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Deposition
-
19-Nov-2025
Deposition
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Deposition
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Deposition
-
09-Oct-2025
Deposition
-
09-Oct-2025
Deposition
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Apr-2025
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
26-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
02-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Jul-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Jul-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Jun-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Mar-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Feb-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal Sub Judge
-
02-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2024
Case Summary: S.C.No. 27/2024 On 20.01.2026, the Principal Subordinate Judge of Villupuram conducted witness examination in this case involving SHO Taluk Police Station against Venkatesh and Subramaniyan and Chellappan. The witness (Santhuru Matham, age 25) testified regarding an incident on 18.10.2021 involving alleged possession of weapons (knife and iron rod), with the witness denying direct responsibility and claiming police coercion in obtaining signatures on statements. The cross-examination recorded the witness's contradictory statements regarding document preparation and signature authenticity. The examination was completed on the date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts