State Bank Of India Adb, Villupuram By Its Chief Manager vs Raghavan — 79/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 01st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVP020000772025
e-Filing Number
28-12-2024
Filing Number
75/2025
Filing Date
07-01-2025
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
13-02-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Viluppuram
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank Of India Adb, Villupuram By Its Chief Manager
Adv. CHELLAPPA K.V.D.
Respondent(s)
Raghavan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Subordinate Judge decreed the suit in favor of State Bank of India against V. Raghavan for recovery of Rs. 2,45,438/-, with 9% interest per annum on the principal amount of Rs. 1,35,000/- from the plaint date until decree and 6% thereafter until realization. The court found that the defendant had borrowed an agriculture loan on 17.03.2017 with a hypothecation agreement, executed revival letters acknowledging the debt in 2020 and 2023, and failed to repay despite legal notice, thus establishing SBI's claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Principal Subordinate Judge decreed the suit in favor of State Bank of India against V. Raghavan for recovery of Rs. 2,45,438/-, with 9% interest per annum on the principal amount of Rs. 1,35,000/- from the plaint date until decree and 6% thereafter until realization. The court found that the defendant had borrowed an agriculture loan on 17.03.2017 with a hypothecation agreement, executed revival letters acknowledging the debt in 2020 and 2023, and failed to repay despite legal notice, thus establishing SBI's claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts