sekar vs subha — 73/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Made Over on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNVP010066922025

e-Filing Number

04-12-2025

Filing Number

5981/2025

Filing Date

12-Dec-2025

Registration No

73/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Made Over

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415 (3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.sekar

    Adv. magesh kumar g

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.subha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Bail

    Case 73/2025 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge suspended Sekar's conviction sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending his appeal, conditional on depositing 20% of the Rs. 5,00,000 compensation amount within 60 days and executing a bond for Rs. 10,000 with sureties. The court found prima facie grounds for suspension in the interest of justice while implementing safeguards against delay tactics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  9. 03-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 73/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 73/2025 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge suspended Sekar's conviction sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending his appeal, conditional on depositing 20% of the Rs. 5,00,000 compensation amount within 60 days and executing a bond for Rs. 10,000 with sureties. The court found prima facie grounds for suspension in the interest of justice while implementing safeguards against delay tactics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case