SHO Taluk Police Station Villupuram vs Venkat Alias Venkatesan — 286/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,427. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNVP010057392025

Filing Number

5175/2025

Filing Date

17-Oct-2025

Registration No

286/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

662

Police Station

Villupuram Taluk P.S

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,427
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 Section 3(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Taluk Police Station Villupuram

    Adv. Subramanian. T.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Venkat Alias Venkatesan

  2. 2.Surya Alias Praveen Kumar

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 286/2025 Summary Additional District Court (Fast-Track), Villupuram | Date: 03.02.2026 In this case involving an alleged vehicle damage incident from 12.09.2016, the court recorded testimony from the petitioner (a Doda driver). The petitioner testified that approximately 10-15 unidentified persons stopped his Karnataka-registered AC vehicle near Villupuram and damaged its windscreen with stones and objects, causing damages valued at ₹13,000. He stated he could not identify the perpetrators and filed a written complaint with police. The respondents' cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the petitioner's account regarding the timing and circumstances of police investigation. The court proceedings were adjourned to allow for re-examination without further details on substantive orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  15. 05-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  16. 02-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  17. 15-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  18. 04-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  19. 13-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  20. 01-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

  21. 17-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 17-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 286/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 286/2025 Summary Additional District Court (Fast-Track), Villupuram | Date: 03.02.2026 In this case involving an alleged vehicle damage incident from 12.09.2016, the court recorded testimony from the petitioner (a Doda driver). The petitioner testified that approximately 10-15 unidentified persons stopped his Karnataka-registered AC vehicle near Villupuram and damaged its windscreen with stones and objects, causing damages valued at ₹13,000. He stated he could not identify the perpetrators and filed a written complaint with police. The respondents' cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the petitioner's account regarding the timing and circumstances of police investigation. The court proceedings were adjourned to allow for re-examination without further details on substantive orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case