SHO Taluk Police Station Villupuram vs Deenadhayalan — 259/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 328. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNVP010055502025
Filing Number
5006/2025
Filing Date
09-10-2025
Registration No
259/2025
Registration Date
09-10-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Viluppuram
Judge
18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) Taluk Police Station Villupuram
Adv. Subramanian. T.S.
Respondent(s)
Deenadhayalan
Hearing History
Judge: 18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 11-03-2026 | Trial |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District Court (Fast Track), Villupuram found the accused Deenadayalan NOT GUILTY of charges under Section 328 read with Section 24(1) of the COTPA Act 2003 (selling harmful tobacco products). The court determined the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to significant evidentiary gaps, inconsistent police witness testimonies, lack of private complainant witnesses, and procedural deficiencies in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional District Court (Fast Track), Villupuram found the accused Deenadayalan NOT GUILTY of charges under Section 328 read with Section 24(1) of the COTPA Act 2003 (selling harmful tobacco products). The court determined the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to significant evidentiary gaps, inconsistent police witness testimonies, lack of private complainant witnesses, and procedural deficiencies in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts