SHO Taluk Police Station Villupuram vs Veerapathiran — 191/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),436. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNVP010046802025
Filing Number
4230/2025
Filing Date
20-08-2025
Registration No
191/2025
Registration Date
20-08-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Viluppuram
Judge
18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
407
Police Station
SHO Taluk Police Station Villupuram
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) Taluk Police Station Villupuram
Adv. Subramanian. T.S.
Respondent(s)
Veerapathiran
Hearing History
Judge: 18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 191/2025 - SHO Taluk Police Station Villupuram v. Veerapathiran Court Decision: The Additional District Judge acquitted the accused Veerapathiran of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) and 436, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key prosecution witnesses recanted their statements during trial, and circumstantial evidence was insufficient to establish the crime. The accused is released and allowed to appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: Case 191/2025 - SHO Taluk Police Station Villupuram v. Veerapathiran Court Decision: The Additional District Judge acquitted the accused Veerapathiran of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) and 436, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key prosecution witnesses recanted their statements during trial, and circumstantial evidence was insufficient to establish the crime. The accused is released and allowed to appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts