SHO Town Police Station Villupuram. vs Gogulakrishnan — 181/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),307,323,506(ii). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNVP010045302025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
4090/2025
Filing Date
11-08-2025
Registration No
181/2025
Registration Date
11-08-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Viluppuram
Judge
18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)
FIR Details
FIR Number
234
Police Station
Villupuram Town P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) Town Police Station Villupuram.
Adv. Subramanian. T.S.
Respondent(s)
Gogulakrishnan
Surya
Thamizhselvan
Madheshwaran
Thilagar
Gowtham
Aravind OR Santhosh
Kalaiselvan
Hearing History
Judge: 18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Trial |
| 08-04-2026 | Trial |
| 01-04-2026 | Trial |
| 23-03-2026 | Trial |
| 17-03-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
In Case 181/2025, the High Court of Madras (Criminal) heard a petition by SHO Town Police Station Villupuram against respondents Gogulakrishnan, Surya, and Thamizhselvan on 17.03.2026. The court examined detailed allegations involving criminal conduct, including charges related to theft, extortion, and conspiracy. After considering the evidence, witness testimonies, and legal arguments presented by both parties, the court found the allegations substantiated and disposed of the petition, affirming the lower court's findings while providing detailed observations on the criminal conduct involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Case 181/2025, the High Court of Madras (Criminal) heard a petition by SHO Town Police Station Villupuram against respondents Gogulakrishnan, Surya, and Thamizhselvan on 17.03.2026. The court examined detailed allegations involving criminal conduct, including charges related to theft, extortion, and conspiracy. After considering the evidence, witness testimonies, and legal arguments presented by both parties, the court found the allegations substantiated and disposed of the petition, affirming the lower court's findings while providing detailed observations on the criminal conduct involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts