A Kumariah vs Deputy Superintendent of Police — 30/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 380. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNVP010020362025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-03-2025

Filing Number

1818/2025

Filing Date

08-04-2025

Registration No

30/2025

Registration Date

10-06-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 380
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 341
Mp/1/2025 Classification : Condonation of Delay Petition Section A Kumariah
Mp/2/2025 Classification : Stay Petition Section A Kumariah

Petitioner(s)

A Kumariah

Adv. JOHN A

Respondent(s)

Deputy Superintendent of Police

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

06-03-2026

Disposed

17-02-2026

Judgement

23-01-2026

Arguments

15-12-2025

Arguments

25-11-2025

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Principal Sessions Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by A. Kumariah, a former Police Inspector accused of cheating, who sought to prosecute police officers for allegedly fabricating evidence by inserting "Villupuram" in complaint documents. The court held that Section 340 CrPC (procedure for inquiring into offences relating to false evidence) cannot be invoked because the alleged document alterations occurred during investigation before the documents were filed in court, thus falling outside the "custodia legis" requirement. The appellant can raise these issues during trial of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by A. Kumariah, a former Police Inspector accused of cheating, who sought to prosecute police officers for allegedly fabricating evidence by inserting "Villupuram" in complaint documents. The court held that Section 340 CrPC (procedure for inquiring into offences relating to false evidence) cannot be invoked because the alleged document alterations occurred during investigation before the documents were filed in court, thus falling outside the "custodia legis" requirement. The appellant can raise these issues during trial of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case