A Kumariah vs Deputy Superintendent of Police — 30/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 380. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNVP010020362025
e-Filing Number
24-03-2025
Filing Number
1818/2025
Filing Date
08-04-2025
Registration No
30/2025
Registration Date
10-06-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Viluppuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A Kumariah
Adv. JOHN A
Respondent(s)
Deputy Superintendent of Police
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-12-2025 | Arguments |
| 25-11-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal Sessions Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by A. Kumariah, a former Police Inspector accused of cheating, who sought to prosecute police officers for allegedly fabricating evidence by inserting "Villupuram" in complaint documents. The court held that Section 340 CrPC (procedure for inquiring into offences relating to false evidence) cannot be invoked because the alleged document alterations occurred during investigation before the documents were filed in court, thus falling outside the "custodia legis" requirement. The appellant can raise these issues during trial of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal Sessions Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by A. Kumariah, a former Police Inspector accused of cheating, who sought to prosecute police officers for allegedly fabricating evidence by inserting "Villupuram" in complaint documents. The court held that Section 340 CrPC (procedure for inquiring into offences relating to false evidence) cannot be invoked because the alleged document alterations occurred during investigation before the documents were filed in court, thus falling outside the "custodia legis" requirement. The appellant can raise these issues during trial of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts