Alamelu vs Kandachipuram P.S. — 1191/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010017132026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

1433/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

1191/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

Kandachipuram P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Alamelu

    Adv. REKHA M

  2. 2.Thangavel

    Adv. REKHA M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kandachipuram P.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Bail

    Case Summary: CMP.No.1191/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Alamelu and Thangavel, who were accused of attacking the complainant (their brother) with a wooden log over a water irrigation dispute, causing injuries under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The court found no prior criminal history and that the victim was discharged from hospital within two days, warranting bail with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond each, daily police station reporting for two weeks, and prohibitions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1191/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP.No.1191/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Alamelu and Thangavel, who were accused of attacking the complainant (their brother) with a wooden log over a water irrigation dispute, causing injuries under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The court found no prior criminal history and that the victim was discharged from hospital within two days, warranting bail with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond each, daily police station reporting for two weeks, and prohibitions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case