Santhosh vs SHO Arakandanallur PS — 1090/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010015682026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

1308/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

1090/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

Arakandanallur P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2) 309(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Santhosh

    Adv. KS.MAHENDRAN

  2. 2.Senthamizh Vallavan

    Adv. KS.MAHENDRAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Arakandanallur PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    Summary of Case 1090/2026: The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Santhosh and Senthamizh Vallavan, who were accused of armed robbery under sections 126(2) and 309(4) of BNS. The court rejected their bail application citing the grave nature of the offences (knife-point robbery of a phone and cash, plus stone attack), the fact that the accused remained absconding, the investigation being in early stages, and the prosecution's strong opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1090/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1090/2026: The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Santhosh and Senthamizh Vallavan, who were accused of armed robbery under sections 126(2) and 309(4) of BNS. The court rejected their bail application citing the grave nature of the offences (knife-point robbery of a phone and cash, plus stone attack), the fact that the accused remained absconding, the investigation being in early stages, and the prosecution's strong opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case