Madhiyazhagan vs Melmalayanur PS — 1078/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVP010015512026
Filing Number
1296/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1078/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Viluppuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
125
Police Station
Melmalaiyanur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madhiyazhagan
Adv. P.R.Senthilkumar
Suriya
Respondent(s)
Melmalayanur PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CMP.No.1078/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram granted bail to Madhiyazhagan and Suriya, accused of theft of three copper coils worth Rs.5,000 from an electricity transformer on 18.07.2025. The court found that after 47 days in custody, investigation completion, property recovery, and the accused's previous bail grants in other cases warranted release. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties (one blood relation), twice-daily police station reporting, and prohibitions against similar offences, witness tampering, and absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMP.No.1078/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram granted bail to Madhiyazhagan and Suriya, accused of theft of three copper coils worth Rs.5,000 from an electricity transformer on 18.07.2025. The court found that after 47 days in custody, investigation completion, property recovery, and the accused's previous bail grants in other cases warranted release. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties (one blood relation), twice-daily police station reporting, and prohibitions against similar offences, witness tampering, and absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts